NFL Gives Gift to Bookies

Written by:
Guest
Published on:
Nov/18/2008

(Associated Press) The NFL has always had a strained relationship with this gambling city, though the case could be made that if it weren't for Vegas point spreads the league would have never become the giant it is today.

The league is so skittish about the city that a few years ago it refused to allow a television ad promoting Las Vegas to air during the Super Bowl. Not long after that, it threatened to sue the city's casinos for hosting Super Bowl viewing parties on giant screen televisions.

And just last week a former NFL lobbyist who now works in the Bush administration was credited with helping create new rules to enforce the ban on Internet betting in the United States.

So it's more than a little ironic that the league's increasingly bumbling referees actually lent a helping hand to bookies by making a mess of the end of the game between the San Diego Chargers and the Pittsburgh Steelers.

It wasn't intentional. The NFL would rather stop playing on Sundays than do anything that might benefit its sworn enemies.

But it was a gift of millions of dollars from a very unlikely source.

"For us it was going to be bad," said John Avello, director of the race and sports book at the Wynn resort. "We were going to take a pretty big hit."

The big hit turned to a big win when referees incorrectly waived off a touchdown scored by the Steelers' Troy Polamalu as time ran out in an ugly game in Pittsburgh. If allowed, the final score would have been 17-10 and the Steelers would have covered the 4-point spread and made everyone who bet on them - about seven out of 10 bettors - a winner.

Instead, the final went down as a quirky 11-10 and the bookies - who needed the Chargers to cover to avoid a costly afternoon - caught a break. No one knows what the exact totals are but Avello estimates $10 million was bet on the game in Nevada alone, and many more times that when online and illegal betting is added in.

The bettors will be back next week, of course, and could turn the tables. So far this season they've been doing better than normal at the city's betting parlors, where NFL football reigns as supreme as it does on the nation's television screens.

That doesn't sit well with the NFL, which nearly a half century after being burned by the illegal betting of star players Paul Hornung and Alex Karras continues to fear its games might somehow be compromised because of all the millions wagered on them.

It's pretty much nonsense born of fears rooted in a time that no longer exists, but it's nonnegotiable in a league that worries more about its players placing a bet than almost anything else. Pacman Jones can still bust up Strip clubs in Las Vegas without much fear of penalty, but place one bet in a sports book and he's gone.

But try as it might - and it tries mightily - to separate itself from the betting industry, the NFL and gambling are still inextricably linked to each other. They have been since the early days of the league, when bookies discovered point spreads and fans discovered that it was fun to have a few bucks riding on the team of their choice.

The fear in the league has always been that players would fall into the grasp of bookies and begin throwing games. But players are so well paid today that there isn't much incentive to risk their careers for a few more dollars, and games are watched so closely that anything suspicious would immediately draw attention.

While the NFL worked to make it harder to bet through the Internet, the league also pushed for the exemption of fantasy leagues from the ban. Those leagues, like betting, spur interest in the NFL, but an argument could easily be made that they're nothing more than gambling since money is usually at stake.

Not as much money, though, as was riding on the Vegas Strip on Sunday as the Chargers-Steelers game came to a lurching end. While the referees debated Polamalu's apparent touchdown, there was as much confusion in the books as there was on the field with millions of dollars hanging in the balance.

The NFL would later agree the ruling was incorrect and the touchdown should have counted. But the score stands 11-10, and a lot of bettors who had a lot of money riding on what looked like a miracle finish on the final play tossed their tickets in the trash.

 

The bookies won this day, as they often do.

They and the NFL have both been on a winning streak for many years.

"Good for us," Avello said. "But we've been on the wrong side of it before, too."

Sports News

Iowa State: Are They The Underdogs To Look For In March Madness?

Iowa State: Are They The Underdogs To Look For In March Madness?

They may be defined as “underdogs” or “Cinderella teams”, a term that is usually saved for teams that have little to no chance of winning even a single game during the NCAA Tournament. Teams like Loyola Marymount (1990), George Mason (2006), Davidson (2008), VCU (2011), UConn (2014), and Loyola Chicago (2018) come to mind when conversations turn toward the most surprising tournament runs in recent memory. 

Syndicate