Super Bowl Props Betting: Debate Continues

Written by:
Carrie Stroup
Published on:
Jan/29/2009
Arizona Cardinals

The Statfox team continues to find Super Bowl props betting winners with their exclusive analysis, beginning with Cardinals' player props.  And be sure to check out Sportsbook.com for hundreds of Super Bowl betting props plus an additional 10 percent cash bonus added to your initial deposit.

Click here for a full list of prop odds at Sportsbook.com. Note that all odds are considered (-110) unless noted.

Kurt Warner - total passing yards, Over 255.5 (-115), Under 255.5 (-115)

SF Doug: UNDER. Only Philip Rivers surpassed this number all season against Pitt's defense (in the Divisional Round). Arizona can throw the pigskin, but 94 yards over the season average for the No. 1 pass defense? Don't think so.

SF Steve: UNDER. While I believe Warner will play well on Sunday, I can't look past the fact that only one quarterback surpassed 255.5 yards passing on Pittsburgh this year.

Kurt Warner - total completions, Over 23.5 (-115), Under 23.5 (-115)

SF Steve: UNDER. It takes a lot to complete 24 passes in a game. Even if Warner does attempt 40, which I don't think he will, hitting 60% on a team that pressures the quarterback like Pittsburgh is difficult.

SF Doug: OVER. Warner has averaged just over 20 completions in the playoffs, but with Arizona trailing in the fourth quarter he will have to throw the ball and settles at 25.

Kurt Warner - total TD passes thrown, Over 1.5 (-145), Under 1.5 (+115)

SF Steve: OVER. As steep as the price is on this prop, Fitzgerald is on such a roll that he and Warner could beat this prop with no other help.

SF Doug: OVER. Put me down for three touchdowns for the former World League and Arena quarterback.

Kurt Warner - will he throw an interception? Yes (-220), No (+170)

SF Doug: YES. He might even throw two, but the first one will come on throwing the ball up for grabs trying to elude James Harrison.

SF Steve: NO. Pittsburgh has been as opportunistic as it has been strong on defense. However, Warner seems to have gotten over his shaky ways under pressure this season and +170 is a nice price.

Edgerrin James - total rushing yards, Over 42.5 (-130), Under 42.5 (+100)

SF Doug: OVER. No doubt James would love to win a ring, but let's not kid ourselves. He's looking for his next stop and wants to prove he's still worth of a good salary.

SF Steve: OVER. Oddsmakers are giving Pittsburgh a ton of credit here. James rushed for 75.8 YPG over the last four, and Arizona has found their ground game in the playoffs.

Edgerrin James - will he score a TD? Yes (+300), No (-400)

SF Steve: NO. Although I won't play this myself, I just don't believe there will be that many TD's to go around and there's a better chance they'll come through the air.

SF Doug: NO. It's a heavy price, but James only goes into the end-zone during warm-ups.

Tim Hightower - total rushing yards, Over 20.5 (-115), Under 20.5 (-115)

SF Doug: UNDER. He'll be more useful catching than running it.

SF Steve: OVER. Hightower has averaged 11.3 carries per game in the postseason. I don't see Arizona changing from that recipe unless they get down big early.

J.J. Arrington - total rushing and rec. yards, Over 16.5 (-115), Under 16.5 (-115)

SF Steve: OVER. Yes, it is true, I am going OVER for all three Arizona running backs. I don't think oddsmakers have taken the last three weeks into enough consideration. Plus, Arrington is the speed back that Arizona will need to mix it up.

SF Doug: UNDER. Arrington will be more bundled up than an out-of-towner thinking the Grand Canyon was a warm weather stop this time of year.

Larry Fitzgerald - total rec. yards, Over 95.5 (-115), Under 95.5 (-115)

SF Steve: OVER. It isn't often that players get on as much of a roll as Fitzgerald has. It reminds me a lot of the Jerry Rice or Terrell Owens situations in past Super Bowls. He will be thrown to early and often.

SF Doug: OVER.  I've never heard if Fitzgerald has a nickname, but Crazy Glue would work as everything he touches sticks. He's on fire right now.

Larry Fitzgerald - total receptions, Over 6.5 (-115), Under 6.5 (-115)

SF Doug: OVER. Unless Fitzgerald gets hurt or Anquan Boldin decides to run the same exact routes, this has to go OVER.

SF Steve: OVER. I'm not convinced that Fitzgerald will be able to hit any real big plays, but I do believe he will be targeted at least a dozen times.

Larry Fitzgerald - will he score a TD? Yes (-115), No (-115)

SF Doug: YES. This is a safer bet than Steve being on the wrong side of the spread or total of the Super Bowl.

SF Steve: YES. Every time Arizona gets in the red zone this is going to be a threat with the way Fitzgerald has dominated the playoffs. Pittsburgh's corners can't match him.

Anquan Boldin - total rec. yards, Over 68.5 (-115), Under 68.5 (-115)

*** as he does with Fitzgerald. Boldin's sideline outburst isn't going to help either.

SF Doug: UNDER. Like Boldin said about his outburst during Arizona's winning drive against Philly, it will be ‘no big deal' when he goes UNDER the total.

Anquan Boldin - total receptions, Over 5.5 (-130), Under 5.5 (+100)

SF Doug: UNDER. I can see Boldin totaling five of Warner's tosses, no more.

SF Steve: UNDER. I love the +100 line on this one as well with the lofty number of 5.5. I truly believe this is Boldin's last game with Arizona. I don't see him going out big.

Anquan Boldin - longest reception, Over 18.5 (-115), Under 18.5 (-115)

SF Doug: UNDER. Only way Boldin goes past this figure is with a calculator. 

SF Steve: UNDER. I'll go with the trifecta UNDER on Boldin. Many of his big yardage plays come on runs after the catch. Pittsburgh tackles much better than the NFC West.

SF Doug: OVER 52.5. I see more points, not less because of the quarterbacks, playmakers and coaches. 52.5 has a nice payout and fits my 30-24 outcome to a tee.

Super Bowl XLIII MVP

Adrian Wilson (Cardinals)  +5000    

Anquan Boldin (Cardinals)  +1500    

Ben Roethlisberger (Steelers)  +175    

Dominique Rodgers-Cromartie (Cardinals)  +4000    

Edgerrin James (Cardinals)  +1500    

Heath Miller (Steelers)  +3000    

Hines Ward (Steelers)  +1500    

James Farrior (Steelers)  +3000    

James Harrison (Steelers)  +3000    

Karlos Dansby (Cardinals)  +5000    

Kurt Warner (Cardinals)  +250    

Larry Fitzgerald (Cardinals)  +500    

Nate Washington (Steelers)  +4000    

Santonio Holmes (Steelers)  +1500    

Steve Breaston (Cardinals)  +4000    

Tim Hightower (Cardinals)  +1800    

Troy Polamalu (Steelers)  +1000    

Willie Parker (Steelers)  +700    

xz Field (Any Other Player)  +800

SF Steve: Fitzgerald +500 or Polamalu +1000. There are two dominant players in this game and both are capable of overtaking the quarterback for MVP honors. It depends who wins.

SF Doug: I'm going with the longshot. Since I started looking at this matchup, Santonio Holmes has been like a recurring dream in terms of big plays. Awesome payout if ‘Big Ben' gets him the ball in stride.

Margin of Victory

Cardinals Win By 01-03 pts  +600    

Cardinals Win By 04-07 pts  +800    

Cardinals Win By 08-11 pts  +1800    

Cardinals Win By 12-15 pts  +2500    

Cardinals Win By 16-19 pts  +5000    

Cardinals Win By 20-23 pts  +5000    

Cardinals Win By 24-27 pts  +7500    

Cardinals Win By 28-31 pts  +7500    

Cardinals Win By 32-35 pts  +7500    

Cardinals Win By 36-39 pts  +10000    

Cardinals Win By 40 or more  +10000    

Steelers Win By 01-03 pts  +500    

Steelers Win By 04-07 pts  +400    

Steelers Win By 08-11 pts  +500    

Steelers Win By 12-15 pts  +600    

Steelers Win By 16-19 pts  +1200     

Steelers Win By 20-23 pts  +1500    

Steelers Win By 24-27 pts  +1500    

Steelers Win By 28-31 pts  +2000    

Steelers Win By 32-35 pts  +3000    

Steelers Win By 36-39 pts  +4000    

Steelers Win By 40 or more  +4000    

SF Steve: The days of the favorite winning straight up and being an automatic cover in the Super Bowl are over. As such, I'll take both teams to win in the 01-03 point range, Arizona at +600, Pittsburgh at +500.

SF Doug: Same message as last year, bettors make money by acquiring steady growth, not chasing longshots (although I actually do like Holmes as MVP). I'm backing Pittsburgh to win by 4-7 points. Boring but prudent.

---

Carrie Stroup, Gambling911.com Senior Reporter

Sports News

Iowa State: Are They The Underdogs To Look For In March Madness?

Iowa State: Are They The Underdogs To Look For In March Madness?

They may be defined as “underdogs” or “Cinderella teams”, a term that is usually saved for teams that have little to no chance of winning even a single game during the NCAA Tournament. Teams like Loyola Marymount (1990), George Mason (2006), Davidson (2008), VCU (2011), UConn (2014), and Loyola Chicago (2018) come to mind when conversations turn toward the most surprising tournament runs in recent memory. 

Syndicate