Jury Deliberating in Kleiman-Wright "Trial of the Century"

Submitted by Aaron Goldstein on

Written by :

Aaron Goldstein

Published on :

Jury Deliberating in Kleiman-Wright "Trial of the Century"

A federal jury in Miami is set to determine the rightful owner of nearly $69 billion in Bitcoin and whether an Australian computer scientist is indeed the creator of Bitcoin, who until now has been known as Satoshi Nakamoto.

Ira Kleiman brought the case against Craig Wright.  Ira Kleiman's is the brother of a man Wright claims worked with him on the creation of Bitcoin.  Dave Kleiman passed away in 2014.

Kleiman’s estate claims there was a partnership between the two men and, after Dave’s death, Wright transferred partnership assets to entities he alone controlled and forged documents to make it look as though Dave consented to the transfers.

Lawyers on both sides have spent much of the month arguing over whether Wright invented Bitcoin alone or whether he did it with the late Dave Kleiman.

The jury is also being asked to return verdicts on seven counts, guilty or not guilty.

These include the following per our colleagues over at CoinGeek:

Breach of partnership: was there a partnership between Dave Kleiman and Dr. Craig Wright, and if so, did Dr. Wright breach that partnership?

Conversion: did Dr. Wright wrongfully exercise control over the property of Dave Kleiman and W&K?

Civil theft: did Dr. Wright obtain (or attempt to obtain) the property of Dave Kleiman, W&K and/or the partnership, with criminal intent to derive that party of the property?

Fraud: did Dr. Wright make false statements or (or make omissions) which he knew to be false, with the intention that Dave Kleiman or W&K rely on that statement (or omission), and did such reliance cause damage to either Dave Kleiman or W&K?

Constructive fraud: did Dr. Wright take advantage of a relationship of trust between himself and the plaintiffs, thereby causing that plaintiff damages?

Breach of fiduciary duty: did Dr. Wright fraudulently obtain a judgment against W&K in Australia, thereby breaching a fiduciary duty owed by Dr. Wright to the company?

Unjust enrichment: did Dr. Wright receive a benefit from Dave Kleiman and/or W&K, and would it be inequitable for Dr. Wright to retain that benefit without paying for it?

One thing is clear, a verdict will not be determined this week.  The jury began deliberations just prior to 5 pm Tuesday before breaking for the Thanksgiving holiday, which extends through this upcoming weekend.  They will return to deliberations on Monday.

Kurt Wuckert Jr brings us the final analysis from the blockbuster trial.

- Aaron Goldstein, Gambling911.com

Related Content

Delta to Focus on Premium Flyers Between Atlanta and Las Vegas

Delta to Focus on Premium Flyers Between Atlanta and Las Vegas

A one way flight between Atlanta and Las Vegas for Wednesday December 7. As of August 20, fight class was a mere $609 with just three seats booked. If you think that's expensive, consider that nearly all the other nonstop first class one way flights out of Atlanta were going for $2000!
Can Prediction Markets Be Manipulated by One Huge Trader?

Can Prediction Markets Be Manipulated by One Huge Trader?

A prediction market can change fast. One minute, an outcome is trading around 45%. A few large orders come in, and suddenly the market is sitting at 55% or even higher.
PA Bans 11 Individuals From Gambling Including Woman Who Left 1-Year Old in Car for 3 Hours in 80 Degree Heat

Pennsylvania Bans 11 Individuals From Gambling Including Woman Who Left 1-Year Old in Car for 3 Hours in 80 Degree Heat

Another was banned for having 28 counterfeit $50 bills, some of which he used at table games.
Is Betting on The Little League World Series Wrong?  Past LLWS Scandals Make This Look Like Child's Play

Is Betting on The Little League World Series Wrong? Past LLWS Scandals Make This Look Like Child's Play

From players not getting paid a dime to the use of ineligible players, The Little League World Series has its own stains.