Bitcoin No Liberty Reserve: Shutdown to Affect Only One Online Casino

Submitted by Alejandro Botticelli on

Written by :

Alejandro Botticelli

Published on :

Anonymous payment solutions company, Liberty Reserve, has been shut down by federal authorities out of the Southern District of New York on Tuesday.

The indictment alleges Liberty Reserve, a company incorporated in Costa Rica, has for years operated as one of the world’s largest digital currencies.  Law enforcement refers to the company as a “PayPal for criminals” that allegedly laundered money to the tune of $6 billion over the past 7 years.  

Liberty Reserve appeared to operate its own online casino, which claimed to be the first and only online casino to use the payment system.  The Liberty Reserve Casino remained online immediately following Tuesday’s indictments.

Prosecutors say the company “facilitated global criminal conduct” from across the globe with law enforcement agencies from 17 countries assisting in the matter. 

“Liberty Reserve was in fact used extensively for illegal purposes, functioning in effect as the bank of choice for the criminal underworld,” the indictment states.

The payment processor was recently used by thieves in New York to loot $45 million from bank machines in 27 countries. 

The New York Times reported that Liberty Reserve was incorporated in Costa Rica in 2006 by Arthur Budovsky, who was arrested in Spain on Friday.  He renounced his United States citizenship in 2011.

Preet Bharara, the United State attorney in Manhattan, was to hold a press release on Tuesday afternoon. 

Earlier this month US federal authorities froze some accounts belonging to Mt. Gox, the biggest exchange in the world’s largest anonymous currency, Bitcoin. 

Like with Liberty Reserve, authorities claim Mt. Gox failed to file the proper paperwork with the US Government.

It’s no secret that Bitcoin has been used to facilitate payment for what US authorities would deem “illicit activities”.

Timothy Lee of the Washington Post writes of the important difference between Liberty Reserve and Bitcoin:

If the authorities concluded that Bitcoin were a money laundering scheme, it’s not clear whom they’d prosecute. There’s no Budovsky for Bitcoin. Rather, the online currency was created by “Satoshi Nakamoto,” widely regarded as a pseudonym. Bitcoin transactions are processed in a distributed fashion by thousands of “miners” around the world. It would be difficult for the United States to indict all of them, and doing so would likely drive Bitcoin mining underground — which could make it even more attractive to criminals.

That sprawling, decentralized network would create a dilemma for federal regulators if former Liberty Reserve users switched to Bitcoin. The crypto currency doesn’t fit well into existing money-laundering laws, and there’s no one who can be required to reform the network to bring it into compliance. Trying to shut down Bitcoin could prove futile — the feds can make life hard for individual Bitcoin users but likely could not destroy the network altogether.

- Alejandro Botticelli, Gambling911.com

Related Content

Man Shot in Back By Brother at Green Bay Wisconsin Casino as More Details Emerge

Man Shot in Back By Brother at Green Bay Wisconsin Casino as More Details Emerge

39-year-old Long Thao has been charged with First-Degree Intentional Homicide after allegedly shooting his brother in the back in the parking garage of the casino.
New Jersey Councilman Who Previously Admitted to Several Murders as Mob Enforcer Arrested for Extortion

New Jersey Councilman Who Previously Admitted to Several Murders as Mob Enforcer Arrested for Extortion

John Alite once claimed to have committed 15 murders, shot 30 to 40 people and beaten more than one hundred others with pipes and baseball bats.
Dearborn Michigan Dentist Braces for the Worst as Plot Thickens in Twisted MGM Grand Kidnapping Case

Dearborn Michigan Dentist Braces for the Worst as Plot Thickens in Twisted MGM Grand Kidnapping Case

Victim is said to have placed fake sports bets with DraftKings on behalf of one of the assailants that would have totaled $325,000.