Kentucky Online Gambling Domain Case to Require Clients Identities Revealed?

Submitted by C Costigan on

Written by :

C Costigan

Published on :

A hearing to determine if the commonwealth of Kentucky can seize up to 141 online gambling domains took place this past Friday.

Gov. Steve Beshear (D) said at a press conference last week that the gambling-friendly state is taking "unprecedented action" against sites that "siphon off money from regulated and legal games," such as the state lottery and thoroughbred racing. Kentucky has lost "tens of millions" to unlicensed gambling, he said.

More than twenty lawyers representing the domain owners were present at the hearing on Friday. Local media is reporting that Judge Thomas Wingate said that in order to grant them standing before the court, they must first identify the owners of the domains which they represent.

Robert Foote, an attorney representing the state, told Wingate, "no one has standing to appear before the court until a person or corporation is named.

"A domain name has no right to have a lawyer, only a corporation or person can have a lawyer, and no one here is going to tell you they represent anyone," he added.

"While Robert Foote may wish that was true, in fact it is not," commented Joe Brennan, Jr., President of the Interactive Media Entertainment & Gaming Association. "iMEGA ‘associational standing' in the US on the behalf of the internet gambling industry has been established by the Federal courts (in iMEGA v. Gonzales, et al). This empowers iMEGA to act on the behalf of one or all of its members in court. And because iMEGA's status as a 501(c)6 trade association, they have a right to keep the confidentiality of their membership, even in court.

"By contrast with what the attorneys in the Kentucky action are claiming, iMEGA did not have to reveal the names of any of its members to the US District Court in New Jersey, nor did it have to reveal any member names to the US Court of Appeals."

It is unclear as to whether the Interactive Gaming Council or the Poker Players Alliance could establish the necessary standing or be required to disclose their members to the Kentucky court to satisfy any standing requirements. For the time being, though, the industry can take heart from the fact that it already has one organization with the necessary standing to protect its interests in Kentucky.

The Poker Players Alliance in particular has vowed not to work with any sports betting entity, deeming the activity as "unsavory".

----

Christopher Costigan, Gambling911.com Publisher

Related Content

Live Gambling News, Top Trending: Updates 24/7 - Wednesday June 24 2026

Live Gambling News, Top Trending: Updates 24/7 - Wednesday June 24 2026

BetDSI Bookmaker Merger - Lucchese Crime Family Guilty Pleas - FIFA World Cup - Laughlin Casino Jackpot - Giannis Trade
Lucchese Crime Family Members Plead Guilty to Racketeering Charges Tied to New Jersey Gambling Ring

Lucchese Crime Family Members Plead Guilty to Racketeering Charges Tied to New Jersey Gambling Ring

Eight defendants with ties to a crime family pleaded guilty to their role in a New Jersey gambling business. They were among 42 indicted last year.
First, Anytime Goal Scorer Prop Bet Payout Odds - South Africa v South Korea: Son Heung-Min, Lee Kang-In, Hwang Hee-Chan

First, Anytime Goal Scorer Prop Bet Payout Odds - South Africa v South Korea: Son Heung-Min, Lee Kang-In, Hwang Hee-Chan

Son Heung-Min pays US$340 for every US$100 bet to score the first goal in the South Africa vs. South Korea match Wednesday.