Poker AI Could Soon Take On Six-Max

Submitted by Guest on

Written by :

Guest

Published on :

Speaking to CardPlayer.com Monday, the co-creator of the Artificial Intelligence “Libratus” that left a handful of poker pros in the dust last month suggests the bot could soon take on Six-Max poker.

Carnegie Mellon student Noam Brown developed Libratus along with his professor Tuomas Sandholm.  Never before had a machine beat its world-class human opponents in the game of heads-up no-limit hold’em.

In the must read interview with Brown, the discussion turned to how much Libratus could ultimately handle in playing poker.

CARD PLAYER: If the stack sizes in the match were lowered or raised, what effect would that have had on the results of the match? Could the machine handle a stack of 500-1,000 big blinds?

NB: 200 big blinds was chosen because that’s the format used in the annual computer poker competition. There’s an annual competition where AI researchers who do work on poker meet and play against each other. 200 big blinds was seen a posing a particularly difficult challenge to AI because as the stacks grow deeper the AIs have more trouble dealing with the increasing number of options available. From my understanding, 200 big blinds is on the upper end of what humans play with. I think that it was an appropriate size to use to keep things fair but also to make it as challenging as possible for the AI. If the stacks were lower, for example 100 big blinds, the AI would have done just as well if not better. The question how would it have done if the stacks were 500 or 1,000 big blinds deep…honestly I think it would have done just as well if not better also. Not because it’s easier for the AI but because it’s harder for the humans at that point. I don’t think the humans are used to playing at 500 or 1,000 big blinds deep. At that those stacks, these huge over-bets that Libratus really excels at would be much more important. I don’t know if the humans could pull off [over-betting] as well as Libratus would.

In regard to Libratus eventually being able to play a perfect GTO strategy, Brown acknowledged he was uncertain at this time, however, he and his professor intend to study this in the coming year.

“If I had to speculate, my guess is that a perfect GTO bot might beat Libratus by 15 big blinds per 100,” Brown said.  “That’s my rough estimate. It could be anywhere between 5 and 50 big blinds per 100.”

- Ace King, Gambling911.com

Related Content

Mindful Online Gambling: How to Enjoy Online Casinos While Maintaining Digital Well-Being

Mindful Online Gambling: How to Enjoy Online Casinos While Maintaining Digital Well-Being

Online casinos have become part of the wider digital entertainment landscape, giving adults access to slots, table games, and live dealer experiences on computers and mobile devices.
Affiliate Marketing Across Different Niches: From Online Stores to Digital Entertainment

Affiliate Marketing Across Different Niches: From Online Stores to Digital Entertainment

Affiliate commissions for product sales, subscriptions, and new users are calculated in different ways. For example, an online store may cancel a commission if a customer returns a product, while a travel platform may only approve it after the trip is completed.
Bournemouth vs Milan Goalscorer Betting Markets Payout Odds - Evanilson, Alvaro Rodriguez, Marcus Tavernier

Bournemouth vs Milan Goalscorer Betting Markets Payout Odds - Evanilson, Alvaro Rodriguez, Marcus Tavernier

Marcus Tavernier pays $220 for every $100 bet to score a goal this day. His value is pretty solid in the goalscorer markets Thursday.
Juventus v Stade Rennais Goalscorer Betting Markets Payout Odds - Randal Kolo Muani, Nick Woltemade, Kerim Alajbegovic

Juventus v Stade Rennais Goalscorer Betting Markets Payout Odds - Randal Kolo Muani, Nick Woltemade, Kerim Alajbegovic

Randal Kolo Muani pays $120 for every $100 bet to score an anytime goal in today's match. Nick Woltemade pays $130 for every $100 bet.