Prediction Markets Have Cost States $600 Million in Lost Tax Revenue Over Last 12 Months

Submitted by Aaron Goldstein on

Written by :

Aaron Goldstein

Published on :

Prediction Markets

Play'N Go Head of Government Affairs Shawn Fluharty claimed during Wednesday's NEXT Summit NYC that prediction markets, primarily Kalshi and Polymarket, have cost U.S. states $600 Million over the last 12 months

Polymarket has only recently re-entered the U.S. market after being granted clearance by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).  

More than a dozen states are challenging sports event contracts in court, with many observers expecting the Supreme Court to ultimately decide their legality.

The current administration of U.S. President Donald Trump is supportive of this sector.  Trump's son, Donald Jr., serves on the advisory board of Polymarket and as a strategic advisor with Kalshi. 

DraftKings and FanDuel recently launched their own sports event contract platforms in December 2025, much to the dismay of state regulators.  But the two companies lead in marketshare in most states where they are regulated. 

 

 

According to gaming industry lobbyist Bill Pascrell III, the earliest we can expect to see a Supreme Court case on prediction markets is late 2027.  Without a Supreme Court decision, prediction markets could run afoul of a future presidential administration.

Congress is also less likely to push for federal legislation of sports betting as this would cut off the spigot generated from the tax on gambling revenues. 

To date, these states have warned Kalshi to cease offering event contracts, in particular sports markets, to its residents. 

  • Arizona
  • Illinois
  • Maryland
  • Montana
  • Nevada
  • New Jersey
  • Ohio
  • Tennessee
  • Connecticut
  • New York

Massachusetts, Nevada and Michigan have had some success in filing lawsuits against Kalshi. 

On Tuesday, Michigan's federal court preliminarily determined that sports-event contracts are not "swaps" subject to CFTC exclusive jurisdiction.

Entities like Kalshi continue to circumvent the gaming prohibitions imposed by (state law) and, in so doing, threaten the health, safety, and welfare of Michigan citizens," Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel claims. 

Massachusetts Attorney General sued to block sports event contracts and obtained a preliminary injunction restricting Kalshi from operating in the state.

Kalshi has filed suits of its own against New Jersey, Maryland and, more recently, Utah.  The latter state does not allow any form of gambling.  

  • Gilbert Horowitz, Gambling911.com 

Related Content

Can't Play With Kalshi From Washington State - WTF?

Can't Play With Kalshi From Washington State - WTF?

Judge John McHale of the King County Superior Court said the state showed "a likelihood of actual and substantial injury ​to Washington consumers from illegal gambling activities" if no injunction (against Kalshi) were issued.
ISPs in France Ordered to Block Polymarket

ISPs in France Ordered to Block Polymarket

France’s gambling regulator said on Friday it had instructed internet service providers to block access to the ​Polymarket betting website, citing concerns that it ‌could expose users to significant gambling losses and that some wagers offered on the platform could be manipulated.
Kentucky AG Goes for the Trifecta Against Two Prediction Markets and Chumba Casino Parent

Kentucky AG Goes for the Trifecta Against Two Prediction Markets and Chumba Casino Parent

It's deja vu for the online gambling sector as Kentucky comes after companies once again
New Mexico Becomes the Latest State to Sue Kalshi

New Mexico Becomes the Latest State to Sue Kalshi

The suit claims that Kalshi is taking sports bets while evading state laws regulating online gambling.