Poker Pro Annie Duke: ‘Smart’ People are Manipulating Us

Submitted by Ace King on

Written by :

Ace King

Published on :

Female poker pro Annie Duke says we should be careful about what we read as smart people control the news and, as such, manipulate it.

Not that Ms. Duke would know anything about the art of manipulation.  She’s been involved in a series of mishaps and controversies that include, but are not limited, to the promotion of now defunct Ultimate Bet.  To make matters worse, her brother Howard Lederer was alleged to have helped orchestrate an elaborate ponzi scheme involving Full Tilt Poker.

Duke reacted to a surprising new study from Dan Kahan and his colleagues that shows that those who are good at quantitative reasoning are more likely to show bias in interpreting data about politically polarized topics. Duke writes:

"When presented with data from a gun control study, a politically polarized topic, all subjects became more polarized in their conclusions, as expected. But the surprise here is that the more quantitatively adept subjects did not do better than their less quantitative peers in interpreting the data as they did in the non-polarizing condition. In fact, they did worse. The people highest in numeracy were more likely to fit the data to their pre-existing view on gun control. Those who were better with numbers were better able to manipulate the data to justify their conclusions when the topic was one that was emotionally charged and polarized.

"This study is disturbing news for rationality. Every day, we have smart people interpreting data for us. Telling us what to eat; whether we are making the world too warm; when, how and how often we should be working out; who we should be voting for and the list goes on…If it is true that smart people are more likely to fall into the motivated reasoning trap, better able to interpret and manipulate data to fit what they want to be true, then that paints a bleak picture for our reliance on the news we get." 

Duke cautions her minions to be more critical of the world around them as well as aware of the bias in their own decision making process.

- Ace King, Gambling911.com

 

Related Content

Alex de Minaur v Carlos Alcaraz - Betting Markets - ATP Vienna 2026 Final

Alex de Minaur v Carlos Alcaraz - Betting Markets - ATP Vienna 2026 Final

Alex de Minaur promises a payout of around. $370 for every $100 bet to win against Carlos Alcaraz (-500) with live in-play betting available for today's ATP Vienna Final.
Racing Santander v Real Madrid Goalscorer Betting Markets: Kylian Mbappe, Carlos Espi

Racing Santander v Real Madrid Goalscorer Betting Markets: Kylian Mbappe, Carlos Espi

Kylian Mbappe is a high priced -360 to score a goal in Sunday's match between Santander and Real Madrid with Carlos Espi offering better value priced at -160. 
Como v Venezia Goalscorer Betting Markets: Tasos Douvikas, Nico Paz

Como v Venezia Goalscorer Betting Markets: Tasos Douvikas, Nico Paz

Tasos Douvikas and Nico Paz both enter Sunday's match between Como and Venezia in solid form. Douvikas is priced at -125 and Paz at -110 to score an anytime goal.
América v. Toluca: Cuotas de apuestas a goleador – Henry Martín

América v. Toluca: Cuotas de apuestas a goleador – Henry Martín

El Club América paga $125 de ganancia por cada $100 apostados a su victoria, mientras que Toluca paga $185 por cada $100 apostados. El empate paga $270 de ganancia por cada $100 apostados.