Defendant in Craig Wright Case: "Crazy Amount of Evidence He's Satoshi"

Submitted by Jagajeet Chiba on

Written by :

Jagajeet Chiba

Published on :

The latest hearing of the Wright v McCormack case took place this week, with the surprise return of Peter McCormack’s legal team for the pre-trial hearing.

Wright v McCormack involves plaintiff Dr. Craigh Wright, an Australian computer scientist and businessman. He has publicly claimed to be the main part of the team that created bitcoin, a digital currency that has seen its price hit a record high of $52665 in recent days.

Wright claims defamation by McCormack via social media channels.

Lawyers for Dr. Wright were hoping to resolve the case in a November hearing after it was determined that McCormack would no longer be defending the lawsuit, however, a discrepancy between the initial claim form and subsequent filings meant that the request had to be delayed until this week.

Lawyers for McCormack have sought the High Court’s permission to re-amend his defense to the lawsuit.

McCormack claimed this past December to be broke.   He was ordered to pay Wright's legal fees in the amount of £18,500.

McCormack himself claims that Wright has submitted plenty of evidence in the lawsuit proving that he is indeed Satoshi Nakamoto, Bitcoin's founder.

petercraig.png

- Jagajeet Chiba, Gambling911.com

Related Content

Alabama welcome sign

Alabama Gambling News

Sports betting and sweepstakes casino companies pumping money into candidates campaigns.
Maryland

Sweepstakes Casinos Can Continue to Operate in Maryland as Legislation Stalls, 2026 Session Ends

While HB 295 and HB 1226 both cleared the House of Delegates, they failed to move any further.
Strait of Hormuz

Latest Iran Conflict Betting Markets as Strait of Hormuz Reopens

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi posted on X that the passage for all commercial vessels through the strait “is declared completely open” with U.S. President Donald Trump making his own announcement via Truth Social.
Dave & Busters

Suit Against Dave & Busters in South Carolina Court Claims Arcade Games Are Unlawful Gambling

A state advocacy group filed a suit in the District Court of South Carolina Florence Division late Wednesday April 15 arguing the chain’s games function as unlawful gambling rather than entertainment.