Comparing Pay Per Head Software: ASI vs DGS

Submitted by Guest on

Written by :

Guest

Published on :

The two prevailing pay per head software choices on the market right now are ASI and DGS.

Many betting software providers force online bookies to choose one or the other, so it’s important to know the differences to make an educated decision about which is best for your sports betting business.

PayPerHead.com is one of the few pay per head providers who allow their users to select either ASI or DGS, and they’ve given us an in-depth look at what you need to know about each software option.

ads-life-300x250-1.gif

DGS: The Newest Software

DGS, or Digital Gaming Solutions, is the newest technology in digital gaming system software.

It has the most up-to-date tools for sports betting management, but that doesn’t mean it’s the better choice for all online bookies.

For example, if you’re new to online betting and your book is full of traditional clients who want to make the digital transition, DGS is definitely the way to go.

The technology enables you to build your online business with specific features like:

      Creating and viewing hold reports

      Easily accessible player summaries

      DGS instant action

      Agent positions

      Weekly information on your players betting habits, like how much they are betting, when, and in which leagues. (So useful for growing your profits.)

DGS pay per head software has become a trusted standard in the industry.

If you don’t have a preference as an online bookie, most pay per head companies will use DGS software.

ASI: The Classic Option

ASI, or Advisor Software Inc., has been building a reputation for about 6 years.

It’s now considered “the old method” compared to DSI, even though it was (and still is) used by some of the original and most successful online bookies in the business.

What kind of functionality does ASI have?

All the basics you need to manage your sports bettors:

      Full player management

      The ability to set betting limits for specific players

      Adjustment tools

      Weekly stats on your players and their betting habits

Really the main difference between ASI and DGS is that ASI has been around longer, so more online bookies are familiar with it and how to use the features to maximize profits.

If you’re unsure of which is best for your business, you can contact a pay per head specialist for some added guidance depending on the size of your book and your goals for growth.

Platforms which offer both ASI and DGS are the most reliable, like PayPerHead.com. They have over 20 years of experience in the online gaming industry, and have been using sports betting software from the start.

Related Content

PPH World Cup Game Prop Bets - France vs. Spain

PPH World Cup Game Prop Bets - France vs. Spain

Bookies across the globe are making out like bandits this World Cup, assuming of course they have the very best in soccer betting software.
Venetian Will Have to Pay $7.2M Fine Over Orange County, California Bookie Case

Venetian Will Have to Pay $7.2M Fine Over Orange County, California Bookie Case

The Venetian Casino becomes the fourth having to pay a fine for its relationship with a San Juan Capistrano, California bookie.
Tennis Betting Software for Wimbledon: Why Some Bookies Are Missing Out

Tennis Betting Software for Wimbledon: Why Some Bookies Are Missing Out

It goes without saying why bookies are loosing out in a big way by failing to offer the very best in tennis betting software to their players, especially with events such as the French Open, Wimbledon (currently underway as we write this) and the upcoming U.S . Open.
PPH World Cup Game Prop Bets - England vs. Mexico

PPH World Cup Game Prop Bets - England vs. Mexico

Sportsbook operators across the globe will be excited about this classic World Cup match competition taking place Sunday between two soccer powerhouses, England and Mexico.