Investigators Lost Geofencing Software Used in Iowa Athletes Gambling Probe

Submitted by Gilbert Horowitz on

Written by :

Gilbert Horowitz

Published on :

A lawyer representing a number of Iowa athletes accused of violating school gambling policy claims that investigators have lost critical geofencing software.

ads-life-300x250-1.gif

Attorney Van Plumb is attempting to obtain the geofencing evidence against four former ISU student-athletes thrown out, claiming that the Division of Criminal Investigation (DCI) illegally used the software to target bets allegedly made on college campuses. 

Plumb said the company learned "DCI may have exceeded the intended outline scope" of its access.

A statement from DCI says they "conferred with legal counsel to ensure lawful access to and use of the technology. Two county attorney offices also reviewed all relevant investigative information before making the ultimate decision to file charges."

Plum has previously alleged that DCI special agent Brian Sanger conducted warrantless searches on the Iowa campus, finding that wagering apps were opened in freshman and sophomore dormitories, but he could not determine whether they were used to place bets.  A request to expand the search was reportedly denied.

Last month, an attorney for Iowa State wrestler Paniro Johnson, Christopher Sandy, claimed that investigators lied to their own agents as a means of pushing forward a controversial investigation into online gambling by athletes at both the University of Iowa and Iowa State.

DCI investigators were initially told the targets of the probe were sportsbooks, not athletes, according to the filing.

- Gilbert Horowitz, Gambling911.com

Related Content

How Many Players Do I Need to Use a Pay Per Head?

How Many Players Do I Need to Use a Pay Per Head?

You do not need a specific minimum number of players to get started with Pay Per Head services like Ace Per Head. You can actually start with ZERO players.
Best Pay Per Head Software This 2026 NFL Season

Best Pay Per Head Software This 2026 NFL Season

We might be a little bias. AcePerHead.com has been a Gambling911.com partner for well over a decade now and they'll be with us for the next year.
Texas A&M vs. LSU PPH Prop Bets

Texas A&M vs. LSU PPH Prop Bets

The Texas A&M–LSU betting action is strongly favoring LSU. The Tigers are coming in with a line of -8.5. They are taking 69% of spread bets and 70% of the spread handle, and as much as 86% of the money at AcePerHead.com.
Falcons vs. Packers PPH Sportsbook Prop Bets

Falcons vs. Packers PPH Sportsbook Prop Bets

The betting on tonight's Falcons-Packers game is interesting because the public clearly prefers Green Bay, but some of the larger spread money is showing up on Atlanta.