New Punishments Announced by NCAA for Those Who Violate Gambling Policy

Submitted by Dan Shapiro on

Written by :

Dan Shapiro

Published on :

The NCAA on Wednesday afternoon announced revised punishments for student-athletes who violate the association's gambling policy.

2-footballisback-300x250.gif

Most notably, individuals will be subject to an entire season of ineligibility.

Those found to be involved in fixing games will face a potential permanent loss of collegiate eligibility.

Student-athletes who bet on their own sport but not involving their school are subject to a potential loss of 50% of one season.

There will be some leniency based on the amount wagered as well.  For example, bets totaling $201-$500 could result in a loss of 10% of a season of eligibility whereas bets totaling more than $800 could result in a loss of 30% of a season of eligibility.

"These new guidelines modernize penalties for college athletes at a time when sports wagering has been legalized in dozens of states and is easily accessible nationwide with online betting platforms," Alex Ricker-Gilbert, athletics director at Jacksonville and chair of the DI Legislative Committee, said in a release announcing the changes. "While sports wagering by college athletes is still a concern - particularly as we remain committed to preserving the integrity of competition in college sports - consideration of mitigating factors is appropriate as staff prescribe penalties for young people who have made mistakes in this space."

- Dan Shapiro, Gambling911.com

Related Content

Gambling911.com news 24/7

Live Gambling News, Top Trending: Updates 24/7 - Friday April 17, 2026

Live News: - Iran Conflict - Strait of Hormuz - Prediction Markets - Dave & Busters Lawsuit - Damon Jones - Kentucky Derby - Senate Odds
Alabama welcome sign

Alabama Gambling News

Sports betting and sweepstakes casino companies pumping money into candidates campaigns.
Legal

Ninth Circuit of Appeals Judges Skeptical Over Prediction Markets Claim They Can Bypass State Laws

U.S. Circuit Judge Ryan Nelson bluntly rejected Crypto.com attorney Shay Dvoretzky’s argument that exchange-traded contracts differ in substance from sportsbook wagers.