Phil Ivey Falls Short in $100,000 High Roller No-Limit Hold’em

Submitted by Ace King on

Written by :

Ace King

Published on :

Phil Ivey Falls Short in $100,000 High Roller No-Limit Hold’em

Big name poker pro Phil Ivey finished in 2nd place at Event #42: $100,000 High Roller No-Limit Hold’em, one that featured a nearly $6 million prize pool.

300x250-MOSS-Anniversary-Gambling911.jpg

Though Ivey did not win a bracelet, no need to shed any tears.  He cashed at just shy of $1.2 million.

Latvia's Aleksejs Ponakovs beat Ivey to win the bracelet and the $1,897,363 grand prize.

Ponakovs had won $3,318,328 prior to this time.

 Aleksejs-Ponakovs-062122.png

Ponakovs had a 33rd-place finish from the 2013 WSOP Main Event.

Despite the significant live career haul over the years, Ponakovs had never won a WSOP bracelet before this event.

“I never had victory in live tournaments,” Ponakovs told PokerGO reporters after coming out on top. “Finally I did it. Nothing could be better at the moment.”

- Ace King, Gambling911.com

Related Content

Top Gambling News Stories for Sunday September 13, 2026

Top Gambling News Stories for Sunday September 13, 2026

Top Trending: NFL - US Open - Alexander Zverev vs. Ben Shelton - Oklahoma State Beats Oregon - Michigan Beats Oklahoma
NFL Betting Software Solutions for Just $3 Per Player Per Week

NFL Betting Software Solutions for Just $3 Per Player Per Week

AcePerHead's $3 per active player per week NFL betting solutions come priced to include some of the most skilled linesmakers in the business.
Conor Benn vs. Ryan Garcia Fight Odds September 12

Conor Benn vs. Ryan Garcia Fight Odds, Prop Bets September 12

Garcia is defending the WBC welterweight championship and is coming in around a -300 favorite to win. Benn pays out $243 for every $100 bet to win.
Man in Louisiana Bets $100K on the Moneyline for Ducks to Beat Oregon State: They Lose

Man in Louisiana Bets $100K on the Moneyline for Ducks to Beat Oregon State: They Lose

Despite the Ducks coming into this game as a much as -24.5 on the spread and -2400 on the moneyline, they still somehow managed to lose 39-31.