Satoshi Last Minute Bombshell Offer to Settle Crypto Open Patent Alliance Case
With just under two weeks until a Crypto Open Patent Alliance case is set to get underway, plaintiff Dr. Craig Wright has offered a non-negotiable settlement, which would involve his passing off claims against Coinbase and Kraken, and his database rights claim against BTC Core—an offer that would put an end to those litigations and prevent BTC, BCH and ABC from claiming to represent Satoshi Nakamoto’s original Bitcoin.
More specifically, Dr. Wright would agree not to pursue any claim connected to his database rights and copyrights in the BTC, BCH, and ABC blockchains. These are the rights which arise from his invention and ownership of the Bitcoin blockchain, and would effectively conclude COPA v Wright (IL-2022-000019), Wright v Coinbase (IL-2022-000035), Wright v Payward (IL-2022-000036) and Wright v BTC Core (IL-2022-000069).
In return, these parties must acknowledge the original intent of Bitcoin as presented in Dr. Wright's White Paper. They are to also stop claiming that they represent the original Bitcoin as envisioned by Satoshi Nakamoto, and “publicly acknowledge that the intended purpose for creating Bitcoin was to create a system to provide micropayments, to allow for the chronologically ordered validation of transactions and to facilitate scalability.”
The original Bitcoin, as highlighted in Dr. Wright's White Paper, was created as a Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.
"A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution. Digital signatures provide part of the solution, but the mainbenefits are lost if a trusted third party is still required to prevent double-spending. We propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer network.The network timestamps transactions by hashing them into an ongoing chain of hash-based proof-of-work, forming a record that cannot be changed without redoing the proof-of-work. The longest chain not only serves as proof of the sequence of events witnessed, but proof that it came from the largest pool of CPU power. As long as a majority of CPU power is controlled by nodes that are not cooperating to attack the network, they'll generate the longest chain and outpace attackers. The network itself requires minimal structure. Messages are broadcast on a best effort basis, and nodes can leave and rejoin the network at will, accepting the longest proof-of-work chain as proof of what happened while they were gone."
Further requirements are that the parties to the settlement (including Dr. Wright) must give undertakings that they will “ensure that Bitcoins shall be used for the benefit of humankind broadly and not to launder funds, evade tax, or assist in any other illicit behaviours.” They must also agree to use their best endeavours to comply with all national and international laws and regulations in force where they operate, “including any laws relating to money laundering, and anti-terrorist financing, or similar initiatives where exploiting and developing Bitcoins and its technology, and where required and possible, actively seek to create code to ensure compliance.”
- Aaron Goldstein, Gambling911.com
