Online Gambling Affiliate CPA Deals vs. Revenue Sharing: Which is Best?

Submitted by C Costigan on

Written by :

C Costigan

Published on :

Online Gambling Affiliate CPA Deals vs. Revenue Sharing: Which is Best?

Gaming Entrepreneur Adam Small of AdamSmall.com asks the question which is best for online gambling affiliates: CPA deals vs. revenue sharing?  And while revenue sharing deals may pay handsomely over a period of time, Small explains why they are not always the better option.  In fact, he titles his piece “Revenue Sharing: A Dangerous Proposition”.

In poker, a single high volume player can be worth thousands of dollars each month to their affiliate, Small explains. In the short term there’s little correlation between the work you do and the amount of money you get paid. It feels like free money.

Operators like revenue sharing because, in part at least, because of the free publicity these deals bring. 

Life Time Revenue (LTR) deals allows gambling companies to punt their marketing spend to the future, when they’ll (surely!) be making millions and be able to afford it, Smart notes.

But they eventually catch on.

One day, however, particularly if the operator becomes big, they will realize that the amount they’re spending on affiliate commissions each month is not justified by the value they’re getting from their affiliates. And at this point, they will figure out a way to cut down that number.

And they will.  Nearly all of these companies have clauses in their contracts that allows them to terminate said contract. 

They can also choose to lower commissions, either by reducing the percentage of revenue shared or by otherwise manipulating the final number that is used to calculate commission. In extreme cases, valuable individual players are removed entirely from an affiliate’s account.

CPAs or Costs Per Acquisitions pay a one time fee with a price that can be negotiated to benefit the affiliate.  Loyal and successful affiliates can negotiate the best deals. 

Small writes:

If you’re successful as an affiliate in bringing value to operators, you will quickly be able to negotiate higher CPA’s. The operators will want more of the traffic you’re sending, and you can leverage that traffic into fair market rates. And if the operator doesn’t want to pay you a fair price, they can’t make you work with them.

- Aaron Goldstein, Gambling911.com

Related Content

'Pizza, Pizza': Little Caesars Takes Full Control of Atlantic City's Ocean Casino

'Pizza, Pizza': Little Caesars Takes Full Control of Atlantic City's Ocean Casino

Little Caesars Pizza parent company sets up a new gambling division.
Chumba Casino Parent Company Vows to Stay in Kentucky: 'We Have Lawfully Operated in the U.S. for More Than a Decade'

Chumba Casino Parent Company Vows to Stay in Kentucky: 'We Have Lawfully Operated in the U.S. for More Than a Decade'

Chumba Casino parent company VGW tells Gambing911.com they have operated lawfully in the U.S. for over a decade and plan to continue doing so following Kentucky AG lawsuit.
Kentucky AG Goes for the Trifecta Against Two Prediction Markets and Chumba Casino Parent

Kentucky AG Goes for the Trifecta Against Two Prediction Markets and Chumba Casino Parent

It's deja vu for the online gambling sector as Kentucky comes after companies once again
These Bad Moms Banned for Life at Pennsylvania Casinos: Bad Dad Too

These Bad Moms Banned for Life at Pennsylvania Casinos: Bad Dad Too

Of the 18 banned individuals, four were accused of leaving children unattended in vehicles while they gambled inside.